HT1000 help please Re. licensing for RX-only?! Randy...?
Moderator: Queue Moderator
- GP-38
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:45 pm
- What radios do you own?: RR Spectras, MT2K, SS3, HT1K
HT1000 help please Re. licensing for RX-only?! Randy...?
Hello all. Last night, I was on the verge of purchasing a 16 ch. VHF HT1000 for the purpose of listening to the local regional railroad. Please don't try to talk me out of it, as I know some of you hold distaste for this portable, but it's one I've always wanted since I first saw the model. (Hey Randy, it is NOT yellow! ) The only problem is...I have a father who remains nervous and against it. The seller claims that there are no freqs. presently programmed, and the only ones that the railroad comms. technician will do are of course RX only. I live in the state of Oregon where it is not illegal to posess a scanner/receiver operating in the vehicle. All I need at this point is reassurance from several of you to my father that it is NOT illegal to have a Motorola transceiver with receive-only frequencies programmed to each channel.
Look, this may sound cheesy but I'm 18 and still under my parent's roof until graduation. I'll be dammned if I'm going to go against his word over something like this. Thanks for your help guys, I will greatly appreciate it.
~Billy Myers,
GP-38
Look, this may sound cheesy but I'm 18 and still under my parent's roof until graduation. I'll be dammned if I'm going to go against his word over something like this. Thanks for your help guys, I will greatly appreciate it.
~Billy Myers,
GP-38
What explosion?
As long as it's RX-only, no FCC license is required. But I don't really see the point of getting an HT just to use it as a scanner. For your money, you get a lot more functionality and flexiblity with a good portable scanner.
OK, it's not as rugged, and lacks the perceived "hey, look at me!" coolness factor of a commercial HT, but you can get more channels, higher scan speed, multi-band receive, etc., etc. in a nice brand new handheld scanner for the same $ or less than a decent used HT1000, and why tie yourself to having to find someone with a RIB and software every time you want to change the programming?
OK, it's not as rugged, and lacks the perceived "hey, look at me!" coolness factor of a commercial HT, but you can get more channels, higher scan speed, multi-band receive, etc., etc. in a nice brand new handheld scanner for the same $ or less than a decent used HT1000, and why tie yourself to having to find someone with a RIB and software every time you want to change the programming?
Only time it's illegal to listen is if you are intercepting and decrypting some encrypted messages. Other than that... if you find them on a frequency... and you have the capability to listen... they are fair game for all of scanner land.E911EMT wrote:It is Not illegal to listen to an RX freq but it is illegal if you are not autorized to listen.
JAYMZ
"Mom and dad say I should make my life an example of the principles I believe in. But every time I do, they tell me to stop it."
Calvin
"Mom and dad say I should make my life an example of the principles I believe in. But every time I do, they tell me to stop it."
Calvin
What, it's not a YELLOW HT1000??
What the . . .
I have several agencies programmed in my HT1000 as "fillers", just so I wouldn't have any blank spots in my HT1000's. I programmed those channels as recieve-only since I'm not authorized to tx on them. And more importantly, if someone were to steal my HT1000 they also wouldn't be able to tx on those channels. My authorized channels are a different story though!
I saw the mention of my name in the title and wondered what this was all about. Then the yellow-cased HT1000 statement brought it all together!!
Randy
What the . . .
I have several agencies programmed in my HT1000 as "fillers", just so I wouldn't have any blank spots in my HT1000's. I programmed those channels as recieve-only since I'm not authorized to tx on them. And more importantly, if someone were to steal my HT1000 they also wouldn't be able to tx on those channels. My authorized channels are a different story though!
I saw the mention of my name in the title and wondered what this was all about. Then the yellow-cased HT1000 statement brought it all together!!
Randy
I Never asked, tried to sell, or even so much as hinted about RSS. The moderators decided to "tag" me for no reason. This is what happens when you ask for help on the board. Your name gets smeared for something you didn't do.
It is not illegal to listen, but depending on the state, it may be unlawful to diseminate <sp?> the contents of the transmission. If everyone hears, no problem. Is anyone going to bust your stones, no.
A radio with RX freq's ONLY (not with TX programmed but blocked) is the same as any scanner from radio shack. No license, no problem. Depending on your purchase price, it may be wise to pick up a handheld or mobile scanner.
A radio with RX freq's ONLY (not with TX programmed but blocked) is the same as any scanner from radio shack. No license, no problem. Depending on your purchase price, it may be wise to pick up a handheld or mobile scanner.
Lowband radio. The original and non-complicated wide area interoperable communications system
- kf4sqb
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 9:11 pm
- What radios do you own?: I can't enter that much....
I have to agree with everyone else. It is not illegal to listen, but why you want to let a good radio like the HT1000 go to waste for listening purposes only is beyond me. You buy the HT1000, send it to me, and I will be happy to buy a new scanner and send it to you in return!
brett "dot" kitchens "at" marel "dot" com
Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!
Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)
-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!
Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)
-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
- w7com
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 11:20 pm
- What radios do you own?: MCS2000, HT1000, Pageboy II
Or, just get your Tech class ham license and then you'll even be able to talk on your $350-single-band-scanner. Being a licensed ham will also trump any issue with the scanner law.
-Joe@nethead.com, Tulalip, WA
I have a private email server in my basement.
I have a private email server in my basement.
- nc5p
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 6:52 pm
- What radios do you own?: XPR5550 XTL5000 XTS2500(V&U)
What a waste! Seriously, even though it isn't specifically against the law, an HT-1000 is a public safety class radio. Given that you are a teenager, cops will probably hassle you about it. They watch teens closely, especially at malls and other popular hangouts. A licensed teenager in Hopkinsville, KY got busted and only his license got the charges dismissed, though I think they still got him on some other vague charge. Go find a tech class in your area and get the license. It's a lot of fun, both my 16 and 13 yr olds have theirs. The younger one wants an HT-1000 like mine.
Doug
NC5P
Doug
NC5P
- w7com
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 11:20 pm
- What radios do you own?: MCS2000, HT1000, Pageboy II
I have to agree. If you are hanging out on this board you really have no valid reason not to get your license. Go to qrz.com and bang on the test questions until you get most of them down. After hanging out here there is nothing on the test that you are going to find strange. The worst that can happen is that you find a bunch of people that like to dink with radios.
I think the test is only about 35 questions now. Ham radio is made for people that want to play with radios... that's you, eh?
I think the test is only about 35 questions now. Ham radio is made for people that want to play with radios... that's you, eh?
-Joe@nethead.com, Tulalip, WA
I have a private email server in my basement.
I have a private email server in my basement.
- MTS2000des
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:59 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS2500, XTS5000, and MTS2000
The main reason the kid in KY was hassled is because he was holding himself out to be an "offical" and had a "badge" heavy wanna-be cop attitude and the real "officals" charged him with impersonating a public officer/employee. Just because one has a radio/license and plays around does not give one authority to show up on a scene of a disaster and start "assuming" command. This is why one should get training and certification from recognized entities (APCO, FEMA, state accrediting boards, etc) and be a part of a recognized program like RACES or Red Cross. With the proper training, one can be a great help. Without it, they can be a hinderance and find themselves in handcuffs.nc5p wrote:What a waste! Seriously, even though it isn't specifically against the law, an HT-1000 is a public safety class radio. Given that you are a teenager, cops will probably hassle you about it. They watch teens closely, especially at malls and other popular hangouts. A licensed teenager in Hopkinsville, KY got busted and only his license got the charges dismissed, though I think they still got him on some other vague charge. Go find a tech class in your area and get the license. It's a lot of fun, both my 16 and 13 yr olds have theirs. The younger one wants an HT-1000 like mine.
Doug
NC5P
As far as carrying an HT1000, if you wish to use it as a monitor radio, do so an enjoy. Just don't be in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong attitude and you should not have any problems. (For example, it would not be wise to hang around a rail yard at 2AM with your HT1000 blaring railroad PD traffic).
One's attitude can get one in more trouble than any device or "license".
Keep that in mind, and enjoy it because fun is what it is all about.
My 2 c.
I applaud your respect to your father and to
not breaking the law. There has been some good advice here.
1.) Not illeagal to have a recieve only if not used for evil.
(check with local LEO for local laws)
2.) You probably would enjoy getting a HAM license, and it
would lend a level of justification in having a radio that could
transmit.(the test is a piece of cake, my 9yr. old is going to take it).
You could tell yourself that you can get the radio as
a reward for passing the test as motivation.
3.) If it looks like it can transmit, you could be opening your
self to unnessesary hassle, just in the interest of looking
cool. P.S. Half of us have been there.
J.B. AD6WX
I applaud your respect to your father and to
not breaking the law. There has been some good advice here.
1.) Not illeagal to have a recieve only if not used for evil.
(check with local LEO for local laws)
2.) You probably would enjoy getting a HAM license, and it
would lend a level of justification in having a radio that could
transmit.(the test is a piece of cake, my 9yr. old is going to take it).
You could tell yourself that you can get the radio as
a reward for passing the test as motivation.
3.) If it looks like it can transmit, you could be opening your
self to unnessesary hassle, just in the interest of looking
cool. P.S. Half of us have been there.
J.B. AD6WX
Re: HT1000 help please Re. licensing for RX-only?! Randy...?
Billy,GP-38 wrote:Look, this may sound cheesy but I'm 18 and still under my parent's roof until graduation. I'll be dammned if I'm going to go against his word over something like this. Thanks for your help guys, I will greatly appreciate it.
~Billy Myers,
GP-38
I'm quite impressed with your conviction. I can assure you that there is no license required to RX. While some states have scanner laws, etc, you have indicated that your state does not and as such - you're golden.
--
John
Awe... That's profiling.nc5p wrote: an HT-1000 is a public safety class radio. Given that you are a teenager, cops will probably hassle you about it.
I'd love to read the charges and the case disposition - for that matter, I'd love to read a transcript of the court proceedings. (I know - they're most likely sealed - I assume he was a minor.) I carry Systems Sabers. They're a tactical class radio. Charlotte, NC used to carry Sabers too so, to them I guess it was a Public Safety class radio.They watch teens closely, especially at malls and other popular hangouts. A licensed teenager in Hopkinsville, KY got busted and only his license got the charges dismissed, though I think they still got him on some other vague charge.
Ownership of a piece of equipment, even if that equipment is considered "specialized" because of its design or its typical user audience is not illegal in and of itself. I don't know the scanner laws in Kentucky but, I do know that the Hoptown po-po were a bit of a cowboy crew when I lived there 85-87.
I would love to see more information on that particular case though. Picking on some kid because he has a radio is simply bull%#^.
That's a good piece of advice. You never know - you might even enjoy being an amateur radio operator.Go find a tech class in your area and get the license. It's a lot of fun, both my 16 and 13 yr olds have theirs. The younger one wants an HT-1000 like mine.
Doug
NC5P
--
John
UpDate For NorthYork20 "Canadian Fed. Law"
We see people all the time
(In The Great White North-Canada I Mean)
With 2 way radios programmed on all
kinds of freq."BUT" it is still illegal to have
a radio on a channel that you do not have written
consent to use in "Canada"It is done all
the time BUT it Still Is On The Books.
This Means RX Only Is In This Rule.
P.S. I Hope You Enjoy The Ht1000
As A Scanner.Good Luck With The
Battle.
Susan157 From The Great White
North ( Caada I Mean)
The Gov't and 50,000 free Ham lic's
In Canada there are no fees for cb's,
marine,frs,and the 50,000 ham
lic's so why should they look into
too many problems.
They make
money from the 10 million cell
phones @ 42.00/cell.Go figure
that one out.
The people on cell
phones do not use correct protocol
a lot of times and no one is chasing
them.
A number of replies have stated that it is legal to listen to anything not encrypted on the public airwaves. Let's qualify that a bit.
At one time, Section 605 of the Federal Radio Act, later the Federal Communciations Act, did outlaw the "interception" -- defined as listening via a receiver -- of communications not addressed to the listener. This was specifically repealed by section 2511 of the Safe Streets Act as to communications meeting the following criteria:
By a Part 90 licensee,
Not encrypted, and
Not by a common carrier.
As to qualifying transmissions, the Courts have held that section 2511 puts these communications in the "public domain," and anyone is free to listen.
However, this does not extend to everything over the airwaves. For instance, most local media two-way systems are licensed as "relay press" channels and are not licensed under Part 90. It is illegal to listen to them, as some industrious but not to careful member of the news media learns every year or so.
At one time, Section 605 of the Federal Radio Act, later the Federal Communciations Act, did outlaw the "interception" -- defined as listening via a receiver -- of communications not addressed to the listener. This was specifically repealed by section 2511 of the Safe Streets Act as to communications meeting the following criteria:
By a Part 90 licensee,
Not encrypted, and
Not by a common carrier.
As to qualifying transmissions, the Courts have held that section 2511 puts these communications in the "public domain," and anyone is free to listen.
However, this does not extend to everything over the airwaves. For instance, most local media two-way systems are licensed as "relay press" channels and are not licensed under Part 90. It is illegal to listen to them, as some industrious but not to careful member of the news media learns every year or so.
- nc5p
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 6:52 pm
- What radios do you own?: XPR5550 XTL5000 XTS2500(V&U)
The kid was a volunteer with the Christian County civil defense/tornado spotters group. He had an ID card they issued and that was what they charged him with in impersonating a public official, in addition to the scanner law charges. Kentucky has one of the worst records for harrassing amateur radio operators. Only New York, Indiana, and Michigan are as bad. Minnesota is almost as bad, but worse in the city of Waterville.The main reason the kid in KY was hassled is because he was holding himself out to be an "offical" and had a "badge" heavy wanna-be cop attitude and the real "officals" charged him with impersonating a public officer/employee. Just because one has a radio/license and plays around does not give one authority to show up on a scene of a disaster and start "assuming" command. This is why one should get training and certification from recognized entities (APCO, FEMA, state accrediting boards, etc) and be a part of a recognized program like RACES or Red Cross. With the proper training, one can be a great help. Without it, they can be a hinderance and find themselves in handcuffs.
I cannot speak for his attitude, but when a young person shows such public service interest to volunteer with civil defense it is a shame to destroy his future the way they did. He might have otherwise grown up to be a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other public safety official. Now, even if he wanted to, his criminal arrest record will prevent that. I doubt seriously if he will ever want anything to do with serving the public.
Doug
NC5P
As far as listening, the sensitivity of any commercially made radio is ideal over a simple scanner. The radio was made for VHF, so it will have the utmost RX sens. at VHF, not wideband and insensitive to out-of-band channels.
We have a GM300 with outside base antenna at our dispatch just to listen to wx, simplex PD, out county ops. Fed the audio into the Zetron Console. Works great.
Jimmy
We have a GM300 with outside base antenna at our dispatch just to listen to wx, simplex PD, out county ops. Fed the audio into the Zetron Console. Works great.
Jimmy
- MTS2000des
- Posts: 3347
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 4:59 pm
- What radios do you own?: XTS2500, XTS5000, and MTS2000
Doug, not to start a flame war, but I am familiar with the case. First off, the ID card was not issued by a government agency. Anyone can buy an Eltron printer and print ID's, using them in a manner to hold yourself out as a trained and certified incident commander will get you what it got him.nc5p wrote:The kid was a volunteer with the Christian County civil defense/tornado spotters group. He had an ID card they issued and that was what they charged him with in impersonating a public official, in addition to the scanner law charges. Kentucky has one of the worst records for harrassing amateur radio operators. Only New York, Indiana, and Michigan are as bad. Minnesota is almost as bad, but worse in the city of Waterville.The main reason the kid in KY was hassled is because he was holding himself out to be an "offical" and had a "badge" heavy wanna-be cop attitude and the real "officals" charged him with impersonating a public officer/employee. Just because one has a radio/license and plays around does not give one authority to show up on a scene of a disaster and start "assuming" command. This is why one should get training and certification from recognized entities (APCO, FEMA, state accrediting boards, etc) and be a part of a recognized program like RACES or Red Cross. With the proper training, one can be a great help. Without it, they can be a hinderance and find themselves in handcuffs.
I cannot speak for his attitude, but when a young person shows such public service interest to volunteer with civil defense it is a shame to destroy his future the way they did. He might have otherwise grown up to be a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other public safety official. Now, even if he wanted to, his criminal arrest record will prevent that. I doubt seriously if he will ever want anything to do with serving the public.
Doug
NC5P
The law in most states is very clear. for example, in GA, OCGA 16-10-23 states that anyone who "holds himself out to be a public officer or employee when he/she is not commits the offense of impersonating a public officer/employee". Pretty clear, if you don't work for a gov't agency or are an appointed/elected officer, you are an impersonator and you get 5 years (felony) in the big house.
Alot of well-meaning hams who honeslty have no intention but to help out become a hinderance. And quite frankly such as the young man in KY learned, you have NO BUSINESS on the scene of a disaster or other indcident unless you are TRAINED, CERTIFIED and APPROVED to be on that scene by the indcident command staff. I suggest those who desire to assist public safety go through the proper channels. Take some courses such as FEMA's EMI classes. Learn what ICS is. Start a RACES group, which unlike ARES which is a part of a private organization (ARRL), RACES is only activated by the county which declares the emergency and directly serves the county in which it exists. If you have the right training, you will know where to be and where not to be. You will follow ICS and know what to do.
the reason we require persons to be trained and certified is so that we don't have persons just showing up at the firehouse and not knowing what to do. I am sure the kid meant well, but he destroyed his own future by breaking the law. Just because one has good intentions just showing up on the scene and appointing yourself some authority flies in the face of convention of the incident command structure, not to mention a threat to public safety where some untrained, uncertfied individual takes it upon themselves to start "running the show" henceforth why he was arrested and charged. Especially in these times, only trained, certfied and vested people need to be on a scene.
Bottom line is if one isn't trained/certfied by an offical county,city, state or federal agency, you need to backoff and let the professionals handle it. Having a radio and some good intentions can create many more problems than it is worth. If you are serious about serving the public in a professional capacity, then go get the training and go through proper channels. If not, stay home and listen to it on your scanner.
Kentucky has a law on the books where it makes it illegal for a person to posses a radio capable of receiving police radio signals in a vehicle. A constable got elected in a county where their had not been a candidate for the office for years. The sheriff would not work with the constable at all. The Constable asked the Attorney General for an opinion regarding it the sheriff must allow the Constable on the radio, where the Attorney
General rightly but sadly said that KY did not have jurisdiction in that matter. The Attorney General opined that the Sheriff obtained the license from the FCC and that it was up to the Sheriff to make sure that they complied with the license and that it was up to the Sheriff to allow access and who authorized to use the system. Now here is the sickening part of the opinion. The Attorney General also stated that the Constable was
violated KY law because the signals where not intended for the Constable since the Sheriff did not allow him to have access to the system, and that it was illegal for him to have that frequency in his radio and/or scanner even for receive only because of the law banning access to police radio signals while mobile. That is crazy since in KY a Constable is a conservator of the peace and has the right to make arrests, write tickets
and process papers. How can a Constable conserve the peace if he cannot hear the radio calls around him. He could easily drive right into a volatile situation and not even know it if he cannot monitor.
General rightly but sadly said that KY did not have jurisdiction in that matter. The Attorney General opined that the Sheriff obtained the license from the FCC and that it was up to the Sheriff to make sure that they complied with the license and that it was up to the Sheriff to allow access and who authorized to use the system. Now here is the sickening part of the opinion. The Attorney General also stated that the Constable was
violated KY law because the signals where not intended for the Constable since the Sheriff did not allow him to have access to the system, and that it was illegal for him to have that frequency in his radio and/or scanner even for receive only because of the law banning access to police radio signals while mobile. That is crazy since in KY a Constable is a conservator of the peace and has the right to make arrests, write tickets
and process papers. How can a Constable conserve the peace if he cannot hear the radio calls around him. He could easily drive right into a volatile situation and not even know it if he cannot monitor.
Just a simple note here, some radios will not alow a blank transmit frequency in the programming, but most all the /\/\ radios I have worked on since programable radios came out will alow a BLANK transmit channel and will beep if the PTT is pressed.
We double check ALL radios using receive only channels on a spectrum analizer to make sure they do not transmit anything. And yes we did find some (not M) that did transmit just enough to get into the police officers portable receiver.
In my experiances listening to the railroads is no problems of any sort, and I love to watch trains, since I was 6 years old and lived less than 1/2 mile from one of the biggest SP freight yards in the west. It was'nt until much later that I had a receiver that could "hear" the trains. Now I have a VHF HT1000 just for train listening!!!!
We double check ALL radios using receive only channels on a spectrum analizer to make sure they do not transmit anything. And yes we did find some (not M) that did transmit just enough to get into the police officers portable receiver.
In my experiances listening to the railroads is no problems of any sort, and I love to watch trains, since I was 6 years old and lived less than 1/2 mile from one of the biggest SP freight yards in the west. It was'nt until much later that I had a receiver that could "hear" the trains. Now I have a VHF HT1000 just for train listening!!!!
- Tom in D.C.
- Posts: 3859
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2001 4:00 pm
- What radios do you own?: Progreso soup can with CRT
"Blank" channels for transmit...
If the radio doesn't allow blanking a transmit channel, AND you've got an amateur license, just put in something like 147.565 for transmit and you'll be fine...or should I say in MOST jurisdictions you'll be fine.
Tom in D.C.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
In 1920, the U.S. Post Office Department ruled
that children may not be sent by parcel post.
Re: "Blank" channels for transmit...
And if you don't have an amateur license, just program in a MURS, or FRS frequency (depending if you're operating VHF or UHF).Tom in D.C. wrote:If the radio doesn't allow blanking a transmit channel, AND you've got an amateur license, just put in something like 147.565 for transmit and you'll be fine...or should I say in MOST jurisdictions you'll be fine.
There are SO many ways to make sure that you don't wind up TX on a system that you are not authorized to use. You just have to think about it a bit.
--
John
- kf4sqb
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 9:11 pm
- What radios do you own?: I can't enter that much....
This is all a moot point anyway, as the HT1000 does allow receive only channels. Just enable "Receive only channel" on the page where you enter the frequency info for that channel, and the line for TX frequency compleately dissapears.
brett "dot" kitchens "at" marel "dot" com
Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!
Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)
-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-
Look for the new "Jedi" series portables!
Bat-Phone= BAT-CAVE (2283)
-.- .. ....- -.-. -.-- . .. ... -- -.-- -... .-. --- - .... . .-. .-.-.-