Page 1 of 1
900Mhz multi-band antennas? (VHF/UHF/900)
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:29 pm
by nmfire10
It's almost 900Mhz time here which means it is almost "more mobile antennas" time. I would like to avoid drilling more holes in my roof. Can anyone point me in the direction of an NMO Multi-Band antenna for VHF / UHF / 900. It would be nice if it had some gain. I found a Comtelco one but it is unity on all bands and only 19" high which won't work. I need "some" gain and some height for it to look normal on a hood L-Bracket.
I would also need a VHF / UHF / 900 Mhz triplexor(?) to replace the normal VHF / UHF duplexor I have now.
VHF/UHF/900 Antenna
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 8:37 pm
by kd9000
I did a search recently and also found the Comtelco, I was also looking for some gain.
I found that Diamond does make a tri-bander with gain, but with a type N connector
(yuk) and it's not sold in the states anyway.
I ended up using an elevated feed, trunk lip mount cellular antenna with a shortened whip. Works pretty good.
With 900 gaining popularity, maybe someone will fill the need.
Ken
900
Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 9:00 pm
by Mike in CT
A cmon, REAL men drill lots of holes in their roofs!
Seriously, Matt, I looked around and cant find anything that would fit the bill... (something we could appropriate).
we may have to bite the bullet and go for something like vhf antenna and a dual band 440/927 antenna.
or maybe some kind of on glass thing for VHF high band.
I get a bit nervous about dual banders though, for 927, since at that band, every little bit of loss starts adding up.
I'll try to find a couple of spare moments while at work to think this out.
heh heh
the R
Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:24 am
by rocketman
I would not even bother with a multi-band antenna, especially when it pertains to 900 mhz. It is a compromise. i would go with a monoband antenna, and not worry about the hassles of antenna loss, pattern disconfiguration, diplexer loss, etc. 900 mhz is too lossy a band in mobile instances to even screw around with. Try to use the best low loss cable/mount assembly that you can find, and keep the coax just as long as practical (don't coil up 6 feet and stick it somewhere hidden) and most importantly......do NOT use adapters.....install the correct termination on the coax.
Dave
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2004 9:20 pm
by nmfire10
Hey Dave, How do you think a 1/4 wave would perform as opposed to the gain antennas you and Mike are using? I have garages to deal wiith so if a 1/4 wave would do ok, I might want to try that first. I guess another option would be one of those stealth can antennas, they usually have some gain.
Matt
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:16 am
by rocketman
I would imagine a 1/4 wave will work well, especially in hilly terrain. As you know, we prefer 1/4 wave on 440 (they work better in our terrain than the gain antennas). It is certainly worth a try, especially in light of the garage opening issues. Plus a 1/4 wave is cheap and broadbanded.
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 2:14 pm
by KitN1MCC
if you guys want some 1/4 900 mhz stuff let me know i can get them from work for free
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:05 am
by nmfire10
KitN1MCC wrote:if you guys want some 1/4 900 mhz stuff let me know i can get them from work for free
Oh sure, now ya tell me after I ordered it.
I don't suppose you can get your hands on UHF 1/4 waves?
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2004 4:26 pm
by KitN1MCC
no all out stuff is 900. these are the little shot galss looking randomes. are u working at all this week during the day
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:07 pm
by k4wtf
KitN1MCC wrote:no all out stuff is 900. these are the little shot galss looking randomes. are u working at all this week during the day
Ooh! Ooh! Me too! Me too! Still got any of em around?
John
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2004 3:21 pm
by KitN1MCC
no but i will see what i can get